|

Fusarium
Mycotoxins:

Vomitoxin

Nivalenol

Lycomarasmin

Fusariotoxin
T2-Toxin,

Fusaric Acid

Fumonisin B1
New! Fusarium mycotoxins:
chemical names list.
Chemical Herbicides
Soil Solarization
Espaņol
|
This
site is supported by a
grant from
Drug Policy Reform Fund of the TIDES Foundation. |
| |
Biological Control of Coca
--
An Assessment of Environmental Aspects
09/01/98 |
| HTML file |
|
Biological Control of Coca - An Assessment of
Environmental Aspects 09/01/98
"The elimination of illicit coca and opium
cultivation is the best way
to reduce cocaine and heroin availability"
General Barry R. McCaffrey. Director of ONDCP
1.0 Executive summary - Biological Control of Coca
Every plant is susceptible to disease. Narcotic plants
such as the cocaine plant and opium poppy are no exception. In most cases,
a single disease causes minimal damage to a plant population, similar to
the effect of a common cold on humans. However, in a few cases such as
Dutch Elm Disease and the Great Potato "Famine, the impact
of a pathogen on a plant is devastating. Biocontrol research endeavors to
find and develop plant pathogens that are capable of destroying unwanted
plants such as noxious
weeds or illicit narcotic crops. These agents have
several requirements, including; specificity to a single host, lethality
and the ability to be mass cultured and formulated in a laboratory. For
example, a biocontrol agent for control of coca must only attack coca, not
tomatoes, peas, bananas, etc. In addition, the biological control agent or
mycoherbicide must not pose any risk to humans or to the environment.
This paper summarizes the results of extensive scientific
ecological, environmental, plant pathogenesis, and other related studies
that indicate the overall acceptability of mycoherbicides for the
biological control of coca.
The key points may be summarized as follows:
1 ) Endemic to Andean countries
2) Non-toxic to humans and animals
3) Coca plant specific (does not attack non-host plants)
4) Long lasting (decades)
5) Wide area use will preclude slash and burn
destruction of rain forest
6) Environmentally compatible with reclamation and
sustainable agriculture
7) Superior alternative to chemical herbicides
1.1 Fusarium oxysporum f. sp..erythroxyli
(FoxyE)
In the mid 1980s, large numbers of coca plants were dying
on a USDA research station in Kauai, Hawaii. The fungal pathogen, Fusarium
oxysporum f.sp. erythroxyli (FoxyE) was isolated from
the diseased plants. It was subsequently found that this same disease was
epidemic in many of the coca-producing areas of the Upper
Huallaga Valley (UHV) in Peru and had been reported in
Colombia and Bolivia. Press reports (LA Times, Miami Herald) estimate that
this disease had resulted in coca crop losses of up to 70% in certain
areas. Establishment of this natural pathogen of coca in other cocaine
producing areas could significantly reduce the supply of illicit cocaine.
Thus, extensive research was undertaken to determine the feasibility of
using this pathogen as a biological control agent for control of the
cocaine plant.
The FoxyE isolates from Hawaii were extensively
characterized in laboratory, greenhouse and field studies. The pathogen
fulfilled all of the standardized requirements for a safe and effective
mycoherbicide.
1) This pathogen attacks and kills the two species of
coca, Erythroxylum coca and E. novogranatense, responsible for cocaine
production.
2) The pathogen did not adversely affect any other plant
species tested in greenhouse studies. Thus, FoxyE is host-specific to
coca.
3 ) This pathogen does not produce toxins (mycotoxins)
or by products that are harmful to humans.
4) The pathogen can be easily cultured and formulated.
5 ) In addition, FoxyE can survive in the soil for many
years, preventing establishment of subsequent coca crops without the
need for repeat application.
2.0 Environmental Impact of Illicit Crops
Cultivation of illegal drugs has accelerated the
destruction of Colombia's diverse environment. Coca is grown at about sea
level in the jungle and opium poppy is grown in the mountains above 6,000
feet. Thus, illegal crops threaten two different Colombian environments.
2.1 Environmental Impact of Coca Cultivation in Colombia
Land in the Colombian Amazon is cleared for coca
production by slashing and burning. It has been estimated that for every
acre of coca bushes planted, growers burn four acres of jungle, due to the
uncontrolled fire. Native plants that survive the fire are then killed by
chemical herbicides eliminating plant competition for water and
nutrients. PLANTE, a government program to develop
alternative crops for coca and poppy growers, estimates that 200,000
gallons of herbicides are applied to Colombia's soil each year to clear
the land for coca production. Many of these herbicides such as paraquat
are highly toxic to humans and can cause ground water contamination. Coca
growers have destroyed a portion of the Amazon rain forest
equivalent to twice the area of Los Angeles in the past five years.
In addition, growers use 17.6 tons of fertilizer on coca
fields and 100,000 gallons of insecticides to kill
bugs feeding on the coca crop. These chemical pesticides are applied
to coca fields by peasants who are unprotected from the toxic effects of
the chemicals. Chemical poisonings are seldom
reported due to the illicit nature of narcotic production.
After farmers abandon their coca fields, which are rapidly
depleted by intensive coca cultivation, they move
deeper into the jungle and establish new coca fields. The abandoned
land is rapidly taken over by cattle ranchers preventing re-establishment
of native species.
2.2 Environmental impact of Coca Processing
Processing coca leaves into the paste that is sold to drug
traffickers requires outdoor laboratories where the
leaves are mixed with cement, gasoline and sulfuric acid.
PLANTE estimates that about a ton of chemical is needed to process the leaves
from each acre of coca bushes. After the coca paste is
made. the waste is dumped into the nearest river. This resulting water pollution has
caused in a sharp decline in fish
A recent article in the magazine Covert Action Quarterly
challenged the benefits of a biological control program for eradication of
coca in South America. A draft of the article is appended to this report.
Several misconceptions and concerns regarding the safety of this type of
program were addressed in the draft. In this segment, we address each of
these allegations and misunderstandings. The allegations are not addressed
in the order that they appear in the CAQ draft. Responses to several other
queries and public misconceptions regarding the safety of biological
control are also provided.
1. Misconception
The US government created this coca pathogen.
Reality
FoxyE is a natural pathogen. The fungus was
originally isolated from a naturally infected coca plant in Hawaii and
subsequently from infected coca plants in Peru.
2. Misconception
The coca pathogen, FoxyE,. could mutate and
attack other crops such as tomato,
banana and cocoa.
Reality
Fusarium oxysporum is a complicated fungal
species. The species is divided into plant pathogens and non-plant
pathogens. The pathogens are further divided into forma specialis (or
special forms) of F. oxysporum. Each forma specialis of Fusarium
oxysporum only attacks a single species of plant or possibly a
group of very closely related plant species. Over 100 different forma
specialis of F. oxysporum have been described.
Each forma specialis of F. oxysporum is
genetically isolated. Fusarium oxysporum is a sterile fungus
meaning that it is not capable of sexual reproduction. Therefore, one
forma specialis cannot combine with another to create a new pathogen.
For example, the tomato strain of F. oxysporum cannot combine
with the coca strain of F. oxysporum (FoxyE) to create a
pathogen capable of attacking both coca and tomato.
Second, asexual recombination has not been detected
between different forma specialis of F. oxysporum. Thus, the
tomato strain of F. oxysporum cannot fuse with the coca strain
of F. oxysporum to create a new pathogen.
Finally, there are many scientific reports that Fusarium
oxysporum rapidly mutates. This statement is true, however, this
adaptive process results in a loss of virulence not creation of a
super pathogen. In order for a fungus to overcome all of a plant's
defenses and cause disease, it must express numerous virulence genes.
Without the entire complement of virulence genes, the fungus can not
penetrate, survive or cause disease. In addition, these virulence
genes are very specific and tightly regulated. Mutations which alter
these genes disrupt the interaction between the pathogen and its plant
host, impairing virulence or
survival of the pathogen. In other words, most
mutations result in organisms that are incapable of competing and
surviving in the environment.
Thus, there are many documented cases where a
pathogenic F. oxysporum mutated and became a non-pathogen.
There are not any known cases where a non-pathogen mutated and became
a plant pathogen. In addition, there are no cases where the host range
of F. oxysporum was greatly altered. For example, the tomato
pathogen can not mutate into a banana pathogen, nor can a banana
pathogen mutate into a tomato pathogen. This holds true of all the
various forma specialis of Fusarium.
Most plant pathogens do not cause severe disease
because it is not in their best interest to wipe out their host.
3. Misconception
The USDA has been tinkering with the genetic code of FoxyE,
a dangerous fungus, in an attempt to target and wipe out the Andean
coca and poppy crops.
Reality
FoxyE is a natural plant pathogen that will attack
and destroy coca. It will not effect opium poppy or any other plants.
The strains of the fungus that are being considered for mycoherbicides
for control of coca have not been genetically altered in any way.
These strains have been DNA fingerprinted using the
same procedures used to
confirm the identity of human criminals, confirm
paternity, etc. DNA greatly simplifies monitoring the coca pathogen
once it is released. As described, this pathogen will kill coca. It is
not dangerous to any other plant or animal.
4. Misconception
FoxyE is a mycotoxins that the government is going
to release to destroy coca.
Reality
The terms, mycoherbicide and mycotoxins, are
distinctly different and are not
interchangeable. A mycoherbicide is a plant pathogenic
fungus that can be used to eradicate an unwanted plant. A mycotoxins
is a poison produced by certain fungi that is toxic to humans.
Mycoherbicides must be registered with the EPA prior to release to
confirm their safety for humans. If a potential mycoherbicide produced
a mycotoxins or a human poison, it would not be registered and
therefore, would not be released.
5. Misconception
Some strains of Fusarium oxysporum produce mycotoxins poisonous to humans.
Reality
There are over a hundred forma specialis of Fusarium
oxysporum, none have ever been shown to produce mycotoxins.
Several species of fungi do produce poisonous mycotoxins, Fusarium
oxysporum is not one of them and there is no danger of this
pathogen becoming one of them.
Misconception
Research has identified the gene responsible for the
deadly effect of FoxyE on coca. Expression of this gene has
been altered in FoxyE producing a super pathogen. The gene can
be transferred to other fungi.
Reality
Over the past ten years, Fusarium oxysporum has
been extensively characterized in an attempt to better understand the
mode of action and confirm its safety as a mycoherbicide. Genetic
analysis has enabled researchers to identify a gene that may be
important for the host specificity and pathogenicity of FoxyE.
USDA researcher's have identified a protein, the 24
kDa protein, from FoxyE that is toxic to a broad range of
plants and may be important for its pathogenicity to coca. The gene
encoding this protein has been isolated and sequenced. In order
understand the role of this protein in disease, researchers are
studying the gene and its expression. All experiments with this gene
are done in strict containment. Genetically altered FoxyE will
not be released into the environment as a mycoherbicide.
7. Misconception
The USDA has proposed the development of strains of FoxyE
with enhanced
pathogenicity that could wipe out coca plants using
molecular genetic manipulations involving fungal proteins.
Reality
Genetic studies of plant pathogens have been
undertaken by many laboratories
in the United States and in the World to better
understand the interaction of plant
pathogens and their target hosts. All of these studies
are done in strict
containment in environmental growth chambers or
laboratories.
Different isolates of the same pathogen frequently
differ in pathogenicity.
Genetic studies frequently involve the comparison of
these isolates in order to
determine what genes are important for pathogenicity.
FoxyE strain En4 is an isolate from a dead coca
plant in Hawaii. This strain is
highly pathogenic to coca and will naturally wipe out
coca plantations . As with
most plant disease epidemics, they target cultivated
crops, which are a relatively
similar, or mono-cultures. Natural pathogens are going
to be extremely effective on fields of cultivated coca, while native stands will
likely be unaffected. There
Genetic modification of this strain to enhance
pathogenicity is not necessary.
8. Misconception
Researchers hint that they took their cue for the
development of a mycoherbicide
for control of coca from a naturally occurring
outbreak of the Fusarium wilt
destroying crops in Peru's upper Huallaga Valley.
However, press accounts
allege a direct link between the DEA and the Peruvian
epidemic.
Reality
The Peruvian epidemic of coca wilt is a naturally
occurring event similar to other
plant epidemics such as the Irish potato famine and
Dutch elm disease.
Fusarium oxysporum was reported to have caused
wilt of coca in South America
as early as 1932. The incidence of the wilt increased
sharply in the 1980's,
coincident with the boom in coca production. This
disease increase was most
probably a result of intensive cultivation and
establishment of large plantations of
coca plants. As with all agronomic crops, the genetic
diversity of the coca was
rapidly minimized as growers only select certain
plants for propagation creating a
coca mono-culture. Historically, mono-cultures tend to
be uniformly susceptible
to a plant disease.
This recent wilt epidemic appears to have originated
in a small area of the UHV
of Peru and has rapidly radiated out to nearby coca
fields. The disease has
continued to spread throughout the UHV and has been
reported in Colombia and
Bolivia. This disease is spread by movement of
infected plant material, infested
soil, or infested water. The epidemic in Hawaii may
have resulted from the
importation of South American plants into the Kauai
Research Station.
Allegations that this pathogen was deployed by the US
government onto Peruvian coca fields are not consistent with the
biology of the epidemic. The genetic diversity of the FoxyE
isolates from diseased plants in Peru indicate that the epidemic is
natural. There are at least two distinct sub-populations or vegetative
compatibility groups of FoxyE in the UHV. The ratio of these
two sub-populations varies widely from region to region. If this
pathogen was introduced, there would not be multiple sub-populations
and the ratio of the two groups would not vary from region to region.
In contrast, all of the isolates from Hawaii belong to sub-population
II, indicating this pathogen was introduced from
infested plants, soil, or water.
Press reports (Miami Herald, LA Times, Covert Action
Quarterly) state that Peruvian campesinos observed US helicopters
dropping pellets of the fungus onto their fields and two-three days
later, the coca plants wilted and died. This disease takes several
months to develop and eventually kill coca plants. In addition, the
epidemic is gradually moving outward from a few infection foci
rather than occurring simultaneously within a large
treated area.
9. Misconception
The U.S. government will force South American
governments to deploy FoxyE
for eradication of coca.
Reality
The following national and international policies
would effect deployment of this
mycoherbicide:
UN Convention Against Drug Abuse & Trafficking
obligates member states to
eradicate illicit narcotic crops
Executive Order 12114 requires environmental review of
US overseas pesticide
application
All US research coordinated with technical division of
UNDCP
DOS/White House Scientific Policy Advisor requires
foreign government consent
to deploy herbicides
In accordance with the proceeding, FoxyE will
not be applied without the
agreement and cooperation of the governments of the
producing nations.
This mycoherbicide will first be registered with the
US EPA Office of Pesticide
Programs. Requirements for this registration include
tier one toxicity testing as
well as, environmental risk assessment. In addition to
the US EPA registration,
the mycoherbicide will be registered with the
government of the producing
nation. Any additional testing requirements will be
done prior to deployment.
10. Misconception
Mycoherbicides are not approved for use in the US.
Reality
There are currently four mycoherbicides registered in
the United States for control of noxious weeds.
|
Mycoherbicide |
Plant Pathogen |
Target Weed |
|
DeVine |
Phytophthora palmivora |
strangler vine |
|
Collego |
Colletrotrichum gleosporides f. sp. aeschynomene |
northern jointvetch |
|
BioMal |
Colletotrichum gleosporioides f. sp. malvae |
round-laced mallow |
|
Dr. Biosedge |
Puccina canalicularta |
yellow nutsedge |
The scarcity of registered mycoherbicides is not
reflective of the magnitude of biocontrol research. There are numerous
research laboratories, worldwide, with highly developed and effective
biocontrol agents. Few biologicals are registered for control of weeds
because they are often too host specific, development and registration is
expensive, the potential markets for these products are limited, and the
products must compete with broad-spectrum chemical herbicides. In
addition, many of these products are-not attractive as commercial products
because they are host specific and they work too well. Because a single
application is effective for several years, if not decades, -it is more
difficult to make the products economical. The biological control product
for strangler vine, DeVine, was the victim of these exact circumstances.
It simply worked too well
|
| |
| |
|