|

Fusarium
Mycotoxins:

Vomitoxin

Nivalenol

Lycomarasmin

Fusariotoxin
T2-Toxin,

Fusaric Acid

Fumonisin B1
New! Fusarium mycotoxins:
chemical names list.
Chemical Herbicides
Soil Solarization
Espaņol
|
This
site is supported by a
grant from
Drug Policy Reform Fund of the TIDES Foundation. |
| |
|
THEN, THERE IS THE FUNGUS Feb 1994 State Dept (DoS)
analysis of Fusarium oxysporum in the Huallaga
|
|
 Then_There_is1.jpg |
 Then_There_is2.jpg |
 Then_There_is3.jpg |
|
R 182205Z FEB 94
11. THEN, THERE IS THE FUNGUS.
COCA GROWERS, ESPECIALLY THOSE ABANDONING THE UHV TO
MOVE TO OTHER AREAS, GENERALLY ATTRIBUTE THE INDUSTRY S COLLAPSE IN THE UHV
TO THE FUNGUS "FUSARIUM
OXYSPORUM" (OR SOME VARIETY SIMILAR TO IT).
MANY CHARGE BITTERLY THAT THE FUNGUS IS A BIOLOGICAL
WEAPON DEVELOPED AND DISSEMINATED BY "DEA" (SOME ACTUALLY ASSERT
THEY WERE EYEWITNESSES TO DISPERSAL OF FUNGAL AGENTS FROM "DEA"
HELICOPTERS IN THE UHV). THIS SOIL-BORNE FUNGUS COEXISTS WITH COCA
IN THE UHV. IT IS ALSO ASSOCIATED WITH COCA IN OTHER AREAS WHERE
COCA IS ENCOUNTERED. THERE IS AT
THIS TIME LITTLE BASIS FOR A SCIENTIFICALLY VALID CONCLUSION AS TO
WHETHER THE FUNGUS HAS, BY SOME MECHANISM YET UNEXPLAINED, BECOME
MUCH MORE VIRULENT IN THIS LOCALIZED AREA; IS ONE MORE FACTOR ON THE
LIST ABOVE THAT ARE FOUND IN COMBINATION IN THE UHV AND NOWHERE
ELSE; OR WHETHER FUNGAL INFECTION AND PLANT WILT IS A RESULT, RATHER
THAN A CAUSE, OF PRICE DECLINE, BAD AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES AND SOIL
DEPLETION, AGING AVERAGE PLANT POPULATION (DUE, IN PART, TO
SYSTEMATIC ERADICATION OF SEEDBEDS THAT MIGHT HAVE ALLOWED PLANT
RENEWAL), AND CONSEQUENT ABANDONMENT OF CROPS BY GROWERS.
12. WE WILL NOT RECITE ARGUMENTS (OR INTERESTED GROUPS
THAT CAN MAKE THEM) AS TO WHAT FACTOR OR FACTORS HAVE PRIMARY CREDIT
FOR COLLAPSE OF THE UVH COCA AGROINDUSTRY. WE BELIEVE NO SINGLE
FACTOR (NOT EVEN, UNFORTUNATELY, THE FUNGUS - IF THIS WERE ONLY
TRUE, WE COULD RELAX AND LET
NATURE SOLVE OUR COCAINE PROBLEM, BUT WE FEAR REALITY IS NOT SO SIMPLE) CAN BE
RELIABLY INTERPRETED AS EXCLUSIVELY OR PRIMARILY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
SITUATION DOCUMENTED BY THE 1993 COCA SURVEY. NOR, ON THE OTHER
HAND, IS IT SUPPORTABLE TO ARGUE THAT ANY ONE OR MORE FACTORS CAN
SAFELY BE DISCOUNTED) AS CONTRIBUTING IN SOME MATERIAL MEASURE OR
MANNER TO THE DECLINE.
13. DOES SEEDBED ERADICATION WORK? IT MUST AT A
MINIMUM BE RECOGNIZED AS ONE OF A SET OF AGENTS OR FACTORS THAT, IN
COMBINATION, TORE OUT WHAT USED TO BE THE HEART OF THE ILLEGAL COCA
INDUSTRY IN PERU. THERE IS NO WAY ITS INFLUENCE CAN BE ARGUED TO
HAVE BEEN PERVERSE; PREVENTING ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW CULTIVATION AND
RENEWAL OF AGING ESTABLISHED PLANT POPULATIONS TO THE EQUIVALENT OF
OVER40,000 HECTARES CANNOT HELP BUT HAVE CONTRIBUTED MATERIALLY TO
THE OVERALL DECLINE.
14. LOOKED AT ONE WAY, SEEDBED ERADICATION HAD ITS
IMPACT. WHAT USED TO BE THE HEART OF THE INDUSTRY IS DYING. ITS
SUSPENSION, ALONG WITH CESSATION OF LARGE-SCALE USG SUPPORT AT SANTA
LUCIA, RECOGNIZES A SITUATION THAT CHANGED FUNDAMENTALLY SINCE 1990.
THE SAME COCA SURVEY, HOWEVER, MAKES IT OBVIOUS THAT THINGS ARE NOT
THAT SIMPLE. FOR ANOTHER YEAR, MAJOR INCREASES ARE DOCUMENTED IN THE
LOWER HUALLAGA, AGUAYTIA AND APURIMAC REGIONS, FAR FROM THE PREVIOUS
CENTER. OVERALL NATIONAL CULTIVATION MAY HAVE DECLINED, BUT IT IS
ALSO STILL SPREADING GEOGRAPHICALLY, GREATLY COMPLICATING
SUSTAINABLE LONG-TERM REDUCTION OF PRODUCTION. PERU REMAINS THE
SOURCE OF RAW MATERIAL FOR TWO-THIRDS OF THE COCAINE CONSUMED IN THE
UNITED STATES. CULTIVATION STILL EXISTING AND SPREADING INTO NEW
AREAS IS MORE THAN ADEQUATE TO SATISFY U. S. DEMAND AND FUEL THE
ILLEGAL MULTINATIONAL COCAINE INDUSTRY. AN ADEQUATE STRATEGIC
COUNTERNARCOTICS CONCEPT MUST PROVIDE A MEANS TO LIMIT, AND
ULTIMATELY REDUCE, THIS EXPANDING ILLEGAL COCA CULTIVATION, NOT ONLY
IN THE UHV BUT THROUGHOUT ALL AREAS OF THE COUNTRY.
|
|