|
Fusarium Fungus:
Unpublished manuscript
(haga
clic aqui para la versión
española)
FUSARIUM FUNGUS: ISSUES WORTHY OF CONSIDERATION
REGARDING THE PROJECTED DEPLOYMENT OF A MYCOHERBICIDE IN COLOMBIA.
Jeremy Bigwood & Sharon Stevenson
Independent Researchers
Jan 7, 2000
A
little dated.
The US State Department and the Office of National Drug Control
Policy (ONDCP) are negotiating with the United Nations
International Drug Programme (UNDCP) and the government of
Colombia to establish a research station in Colombia with an aim
to "large-scale implementation" for applying the
Fusarium fungus as a mycoherbicide to destroy Colombian coca
plantations. The agreement includes the handover of
more than 15 years of USDA research to the UNDCP.
The US Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Agricultural
Research Service (ARS) labels all narcotic crops as
"weeds." While the concept of using herbicides against
weeds and camouflaging cover foliage is not novel, however, using
them against crops is. And while the promotion of mycoherbicides
at first impression might appear to be a logical solution to the
ongoing chronic problem of drug abuse, our investigation so far
indicates that no independent agency has tested and evaluated the
use of the mycoherbicidal strain EN-4 of Fusarium oxysporum.
Its use is fraught with major uncertainties, with implications far
beyond the areas and the time frames of its proposed use.
Our concerns about the proposed use of Fusarium in Colombia
involve the following issues:
- non-specificity of the applied fungus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
History
The Hawaiian Outbreak
Fusarium oxysporum is a fungus known to attack many
plants, most notably food crops. During the 1960's through the
1980's, a wilting and dying of coca plants were observed at a USG
research station in Hawaii (formerly operated by a major
soft-drink manufacturer). The causative factor was found to be the
fungal mold Fusarium oxysporum, inhabiting the soil. The
source of the soil-borne Fusarium was not clearly determined, and
several possible vectors were hypothesized, including potting soil
or water contaminated by an indigenous Hawaiian Fusarium.
The US Government Response
As cocaine use grew in the United States, USG entities and
other researchers initiated a series of detailed scientific
studies into the strain of Fusarium responsible for killing the
Hawaiian coca, focusing on determining and isolating the chemical
causative agents of the disease; methods of mass-producing the
fungus; developing application media for field use; and finding
strains of Fusarium to kill other narcotic plants.
The Peruvian Outbreak
During the early 1990's, fully two decades after the fungus
first broke out amongst Hawaiian coca plants, another Fusarium
epidemic, known locally as "seca-seca" swept through the
coca patches of the upper Huallaga Valley in eastern Peru.
Coincidentally, one of the apparent epicenters of the disease was
near the US antinarcotics fire base at Santa Lucia.
Peasants in the area complained of their coca patches being
sprayed from helicopters. In a debriefing of the US-funded
Peruvian National Coordinator for Human Rights ("La
Coordinadora") about their 1993 Annual Trip to Peru’s
Huallaga Valley Jungle Region, "the delegation was struck,
however, by the devastation caused by the fungus plague that is
withering coca crops. They were assailed at almost every stop with
accounts of US DEA airplanes spreading "fungus pods"
over the coca fields..."
Non-specificity and effects on populations
Over the last decade, the disease spread to the Yurimaguas
area, the northern limit of Peruvian coca cultivation as well as
beyond Pucallpa in the east. During this period, disturbing
revelations about its nature were documented by the US State
Department through the US embassy in Lima, who were following its
progression in their reports to Washington, D.C.. The embassy
recorded reports that the Fusarium coca wilt disease was not
specific to coca, but killed other crops, too: "Meanwhile,
reportedly 3000 farmers in the Tingo Maria and Leonicio Prado area…have
had to scratch for other means of earning a living, including
panning for gold, when a plant disease, ‘seca-seca’ which had
previously attacked coca plants broke out again in alternate crops
planted in former coca beds." The disease also caused
migrations of population, sometimes deeper into the jungle, or to
other areas to avoid the plague: "Coca growers, especially
those abandoning the UHV to move into other areas, generally
attribute the industry’s collapse in the UHV to the
fungus..." The US Government also contracted research in the
field, and resultant tests showed that the same Fusarium that was
killing the coca also killed tomato, achiote, and papaya:
"the fungus is not specific to coca, but may infect other
crops. This may be consistent with WINDELS, 1991, who states that
not all special strains of F. oxysporum are specific, but may
affect a wide range of hosts".,
Longevity
A contract proposal submitted by researchers to the US DEA
states: "It [Fusarium oxysporum] stays in the soil for
years." our brackets[]. And, indeed, the Project Document
contract between the United Nations International Drug Control
Programme/Project of the Government of Colombia states that
Fusarium "causes a debilitating disease and persists in the
soil for several years."2 Dr. David Struhs of the
Florida Department of Environmental Protection wrote: "The
fungus can remain in the soil for as long as 40 years."
The Florida experience
In 1998, the US Congress proposed that the ONDCP create a
10-year "Master Plan for Mycoherbicides to Control Narcotic
Crops" in the US and in every drug-crop producing country in
the world from Latin America, through the Middle East to Asia. By
early, 1999, Jim McDonough, who formerly worked for the ONDCP was
hired by Gov. Jeb Bush to head Florida's Office of Drug Control,
was lobbying for the use of Fusarium against Florida’s illicit
marijuana crop. After concerns were raised by other State
entities, notably the departments of Environment and Agriculture,
enraged citizens and the press the idea was dropped.
Mutagenicity
Secretary of the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection, David Struhs wrote in a April 6, 1999 letter:
"Fusarium species are capable of evolving rapidly...
Mutagenicity is by far the most disturbing factor in attempting to
use a Fusarium species as a bioherbicide. It is difficult, if not
impossible, to control the spread of Fusarium species. The mutated
fungi can cause disease in a large number of crops, including
tomatoes, peppers, flowers, corn and vines, and are normally
considered a threat to farmers as a pest, rather than as a
pesticide. Fusarium species are more active in warm soils and can
stay resident in the soil for years. Their longevity and enhanced
activity under Florida conditions are of concern, as this could
lead to an increased risk of mutagenicity." Mutagenicity in
this case, would, in common terms, refer to the ability of some of
the characteristics of the fungus to change. These changes could
be in physical characteristics, toxicity, and host-specificity,
among other things. Indeed, mutagenicity has been the subject, and
indeed, the object of Fusarium research, even though the US
Environmental Protection Agency prohibits the release of mutated
fungi in the wild without prior approval: "Mutation research
in our laboratory is directed toward generation of at least three
kinds of mutants: auxotrophs (need help to grow in terms of added
chemicals), survival cripples (can’t survive due to lack of
sclerotia), and host range reduced pathogens."11
Misdirected Research
The research performed by ARS scientists and others quickly
focused on a protein found in Fusarium that was partially
responsible for the wilting disease in host plants. This compound
was labeled "24kDa protein." Many additional scientific
papers followed on this theme, but it appears the scientists
focused on this novel protein, neglecting to perform basic
analysis of Fusarium for the toxins generally associated with the
genus. Nothing in the USDA literature available on the Internet or
obtained through the Freedom of Information Act indicates ARS did
studies on this particular Fusarium species’ toxicity to animals
or humans, whether in natural or "mutant " form. There
is, however, plenty of evidence of the toxicity of compounds
produced by Fusarium species in mammals, including humans.
Fusarium’s toxicity to animals and humans depends on several
factors including local environment, climate, soil, competition
with locally present microorganisms including fungi, delivery
medium and concentration of the application, as well as the
particular strain of fungus being applied. The toxins Fumonisin B1
(Macrofusine or FB1), B2, and B3
have been isolated from members of the genus Fusarium including a
variety of Fusarium oxysporum. A 1995 ARS report states,
"Fumonisin B1 is an important phytotoxin and
mammalian toxin. This is the first report of fumonisins produced
by a variety of Fusarium oxysporum which is a
well-known pathogen of economically important crops. It is
possible that the fumonisins are involved in the pathogenesis of F.
oxysporum." FB1 can be a causative agent in
pulmonary edema in pigs, and there is an association between FB1
and FB2 with human esophageal cancer, and is
carcinogenic in rats. Indeed, its toxicity in mammals is of such
consequence that reviews of its effects have been published. ,
Even the ARS abstracts on the Internet document health effects on
animals: "Elevated plasma glycosaminoglycans in chickens with
tibial dyschondroplasia induced by a Fusarium oxysporum
isolate."
Many species of the genus Fusarium contain far more dangerous
toxins than the aforementioned Fumonisin B1
(Macrofusine or FB1), B2, and B3.
The genus Fusarium is also known to contain Nivalenol, a compound
whose "potential symptoms of overexposure include, fever,
nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, leukopenia, bleeding, sepsis; necrotic
lesions of skin and mucosa," as well as Deoxynivalenol
(Vomitoxin),
"implicated as a chemical warfare agent."23
Even more toxic is Fusariotoxin, which is also known as Mycotoxin
T2: "Direct contact may cause extensive inflammation and
tissue necrosis," and "Topical exposure has lead to
systemic toxicity and death in experimental animals."
Indeed, Fusariotoxin (Mycotoxin T2) is considered in the
Nuclear, Biological and Chemical warfare literature as a
biological warfare agent. We include the above references to
compounds found in other species of Fusarium because laboratory
experiments have shown that fungi can produce varying amounts of
chemically different toxins based upon substrate (host) and at
different periods of its life cycle, etc., and it not unlikely
that under certain conditions other novel toxins can be produced
by Fusarium oxysporum.
Summary
Fungi are the world’s largest organisms. Because the majority
live underground, and are only visible in the form of mushrooms
during reproduction, they are taken for granted. However, issues
surrounding the use the Fusarium fungus as a mycoherbicide have
not undergone careful scrutiny by independent experts. The concept
of killing off natural Amazonian mycoflora, flora, and fauna with
massive infusions of a fungus that can inhabit soil for decades or
more; that may produce undetermined amounts of known toxins
affecting many forms of life; that may kill species other than the
target species; and may produce unquantifiable mutations; in an
area whose ecosystem supplies much of the planet’s oxygen, is a
risky business at best.
Endnotes:
Revised
06/24/00
Home
Page
Página
central
|